He also recognized Pierluigi Collina: there was neither the severity nor the expulsion of Campagnaro, decreed by the referee windbreaker in Marassi, which changed the "destiny" of Genoa-Napoli.
"Yes, it's true: it was a difficult day, there was some problems this weekend, I'll talk with my officials" acknowledged the "design" of the Italian referees.
"After two positive days," says Hill, this time there were a lot of criticism of the referees. It starts proprioo, during the program "Gr-Policy in Parliament ball" from Genoa and Naples.
At 28 ° of the first half, the referee ejects Tagliavento Criscito (for a vaffa ...) and then "offset" with a non-existent penalty and expulsion dell'incolpevole Campagnaro Gasperini's team.
"The expulsion of the Genoa player? It seemed clear on TV, right?". Right decision, then.
And the penalty? "Tagliavento was at 50-60 meters ...".
Location wrong? "No, that could not be there because there was a postponement of the goalkeeper. He could not see well. Moreover, the penalty was not clear that there was only via television, and a camera placed behind the door. Even the assistant could not see. Here, in this situation would be very useful to the judge, or arbitrator, which debuts in area, as an experiment, this week in the Champions League. " In fact
Hill escapes a double problem: a) the state of mind "Compensatory" of windbreaker, which has dragged the first time until the 50th minute, b) the role of the linesman, who on the launch of avverdaria goalkeeper must stand in the other half field: Or else what they look? And
salvagente.it
0 comments:
Post a Comment